![]() ![]() (eels. Initially, the issue was o.pened for me when. I came to the present stance gradual1y and via many inf1uenc~s other than' research results. '-', '.' :' veridical - the constructionalist is apt to emp~asize the relativistic nature of ' r "', " consensual validation. In addition, it differs from critical realism in its emphasis on construction critical realists are, prone to'accept their perceptions of the physical world as more or less " :~ ,". As a biologist and a physician I can attest to the 'reality' of the psychological as wen as the physical, : constructions that I face daily'inAaboratory and clinic My realism is' therefore neither naive nor physicalistic. The results of the research - and I am aware of, the criticism that the results of brain research can have no bearing on ontological issues - have led me to a position best described as a biological constructional realism. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |